Home   |   Animals   |   General Topics   |   About Us
Deutsch Zur deutschen Version
Animal Protection
-Contents
-Revolutionizing Animal Protection
-Problems in today's Animal Welfare
-The Mutilation of Animal Protection
-Heavy Petting  P: 0.12
-Scandal and Corruption uncovered in Animal Protection Organizations
-Lies in Animal Protection
-Voluntary Ethics-Tax
-Power over the Male
-Animal Protection Switzerland
-Animal Protection Links
 Animal Protection
Macht über das Männliche
Power over the Male
Big, strong "macho" animals exert a special fascination on people. Unfortunately for them.  [more...]
Home >> General Topics >> Animal Protection
Registration | Log in!Login

Revolutionizing Animal Protection
By: Mark Schmid
Version: 2010.02.18
First published: 2007.10.17
 Total Reads: 1227  (En: 755)


In Physics, there is a scientific formula, a fact, which revolutionized physics as we know it today:

E = mc²


In animal protection, there is also a scientific formula, a fact, which revolutionizes animal protection as we know it today:

Castration is not compatible with animal protection.


We will leave proving the physical fact stated above to others which are much more intelligent than we are. We focus on proving the second fact, the fact about animal protection.

Here's the short form:

Animal protection as a general concept and a human motivation, is based on rational reasoning using similarity. Similarity between humans and animals. If animals eat, sleep, shit, have sex, die and cry out when mutilated, just like we do ourselves, it might be equally or similarly cruel and mean if animals are harmed, as we think it is if we are.
Animal protection thus is triggered and motivated by similarity between humans and animals. The similarity between humans and animals sets off and motivates rational reasoning in humans about the treatment of animals known as animal protection.

Anything showing or stressing similarities or even equalities between humans and animals is therefore a primary source and a original motivation for all forms and kinds of animal protection.
Anything hiding, negating or tabooing similarities between humans and animals or artificially separating animals and humans into two distinctive different classes, therefore is in direct opposition and most severely undermines and sabotages any kind of animal protection in its most fundamental root: Human motivation based on rational reason founded in similarity.

Castration is such an artificial dividing border, which separates animals and humans into two very distinctive, very different classes, stressing that the two are obviously very not equal and very not similar: While it is 100% not O.K. to castrate the one, it is 100% O.K. to castrate the other.

Because castration is such a severe mutilation, committed against so many animals in our responsibility (99% of some species and / or some gender), yet at the same time considered to be such an atrocity when done to humans, there is nothing as destructive and as catastrophic to animal protection in general and in a wider sense today as the castration of animals.

Truly, propagating the castration of animals as almost all animal protection organizations are doing today (or standing idly by, while thousands of animals are castrated every day), is sabotaging and a castrating animal protection in its source.
Collecting and making money with animal protection, even by the government (animal lawyers) because animal protection is supposedly insufficient and too weak, while at the same sabotaging and castrating animal protection in such a severe manner is a perversion and a crime not only against animal protection, but against all animals.

Every castration of an animal, no matter whether carried out yourself with a kitchen knife at home or by a veterinarian in an operating room, sends out the following message very loud and clear to society:
  • It is not only 100% O.K., but even especially good and exemplary, if animal owners rid themselves of their responsibilities for their animals and their needs as conveniently as possible for themselves and at the sole expense of the animal.
  • Any and all needs of animals may be subordinated to any and all needs of animal owners unconditionally.
  • Animals are not living beings with own rights, not even the most basic ones such as physical integrity, but objects, riding mounts and toys, consumer products of veterinarians, which we may instrumentalize and mutilate any way we choose in order to satisfy any and all of our needs as conveniently as possible for us.

Are these really the messages that "animal" protection organizations should be sending out?

People need to learn that they cannot have everything for their pleasure and their fun just because they want it. - At the expense of others. Some learn this out of their own accord. But many need to be taught this by society.
We intend to do something about it.





Make a Donation

We need your help to change the world to the better for animals.
Please support our organization with a donation so we can continue to publish important free information on behalf of animals!



Publisher  |   (c) Copyright 2010  |   Disclaimer  |   Terms of Use  |   Contact